High Performance Concrete Exchange
High Performance Concrete Exhange Graphic  High Performance Concrete Exhange Graphic |

  Sunday, November 22    

  HPC Structural Design and Specifications

  

   


Group moderated by Tom Saad. Long-term performance benefits can be achieved in highway structures when high performance concrete (HPC) is properly used in the structural system. The main benefits for utilizing high strength concrete (HSC) in bridge elements is to extend span lengths of bridges with commonly fabricated girder types, reduce the depth of superstructures, and eliminate girder lines to offer cost-efficiency. The vast majority of bridges in the United States are constructed with concretes with compressive strengths less than 10 ksi. From the structural engineer’s viewpoint, the major impediment to deploying HPC has been the limited validation of design provisions for HSC. It provides a synthesis of information on the mechanical properties of HSC and offers guidance to structural engineers regarding the use of HSC. The information presented is based on the state-of-the-art of HSC and may not be included in the AASHTO bridge design specifications. The AASHTO Standard Specifications limit the compressive strength of prestressed concrete to 5 ksi. In the AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Specifications the limit has been increased to 10 ksi. Both specifications allow, at the discretion of the Engineer, the use of higher strengths if tests are conducted to establish various mechanical properties of concrete. Furthermore, the LRFD specification prohibits the use of concrete with strengths below 2.4 ksi at 28 days.

Click here to go to Discussion Click here to go to Reference Click here to go to Works in Progress Click here to go to the Directory
Click here to go to the next page of the view Click here to go to the previous page of the view Click here to collapse the view Click here to expand the view


Add Discussion Item


flexural behavior of hpc (no responses) 11/28/2007 --- Anonymous
GGBS (no responses) 5/17/2007 --- Anonymous
Hide details for [<B>]Bridge Deck Reinforcement Requirements[<i><font size=-1>] (4 responses)[</i></B></font>]   [<B>]1/05/2006Bridge Deck Reinforcement Requirements (4 responses) 1/05/2006 --- Lou Triandafilou
Hide details for [<FONT SIZE=-1><i>]Re: Bridge Deck Reinforcement Requirements  [<i>] ---           [<FONT SIZE=-1><i>] 1/06/20Re: Bridge Deck Reinforcement Requirements --- 1/06/2006  --- Anonymous
Re: Bridge Deck Reinforcement Requirements --- 7/21/2008  --- Anonymous
Re: Bridge Deck Reinforcement Requirements --- 12/19/2008  --- Anonymous
Re: Bridge Deck Reinforcement Requirements --- 10/02/2006  --- Benjamin Beerman
Hide details for [<B>]prestresed/ precast concrete[<i><font size=-1>] (3 responses)[</i></B></font>]   [<B>]10/22/2005 --- hazeprestresed/ precast concrete (3 responses) 10/22/2005 --- hazem allam
Hide details for [<FONT SIZE=-1><i>]Re: prestresed/ precast concrete  [<i>] ---           [<FONT SIZE=-1><i>] 7/21/2008 [</i></Re: prestresed/ precast concrete --- 7/21/2008  --- Anonymous
Re: prestresed/ precast concrete --- 4/13/2009  --- Anonymous
Re: prestresed/ precast concrete --- 11/27/2008  --- Anonymous
Hide details for [<B>]Excessive Camber in PC and HPC Beams[<i><font size=-1>] (4 responses)[</i></B></font>]   [<B>]2/12/2004 -Excessive Camber in PC and HPC Beams (4 responses) 2/12/2004 --- Olu. A. Adeyemi
Hide details for [<FONT SIZE=-1><i>]Re: Excessive Camber in PC and HPC Beams  [<i>] ---           [<FONT SIZE=-1><i>] 3/03/2004Re: Excessive Camber in PC and HPC Beams --- 3/03/2004  --- Kevin R. Pruski
Hide details for [<FONT SIZE=-1><i>]Re: Excessive Camber in PC and HPC Beams  [<i>] ---           [<FONT SIZE=-1><i>] 9/11/2009Re: Excessive Camber in PC and HPC Beams --- 9/11/2009  --- David Hawes
Re: Excessive Camber in PC and HPC Beams --- 9/11/2009  --- Jim Getaz
Re: Excessive Camber in PC and HPC Beams --- 8/14/2004  --- Anonymous
Hide details for [<B>]Ratio of release strength and 28- or 56-day strength[<i><font size=-1>] (2 responses)[</i></B></font>]   Ratio of release strength and 28- or 56-day strength (2 responses) 5/13/2002 --- Anonymous
Re: Ratio of release strength and 28- or 56-day strength --- 5/13/2002  --- Shri Bhide
Re: Ratio of release strength and 28- or 56-day strength --- 8/06/2002  --- Anonymous
Hide details for [<B>]56 day v/s 28 day strength[<i><font size=-1>] (4 responses)[</i></B></font>]   [<B>]5/13/2002 --- Anonymo56 day v/s 28 day strength (4 responses) 5/13/2002 --- Anonymous
Re: 56 day v/s 28 day strength --- 5/13/2002  --- Shri Bhide
Hide details for [<FONT SIZE=-1><i>]Re: 56 day v/s 28 day strength  [<i>] ---           [<FONT SIZE=-1><i>] 8/06/2002 [</i></i>Re: 56 day v/s 28 day strength --- 8/06/2002  --- Anonymous
Re: 56 day v/s 28 day strength --- 8/28/2007  --- Anonymous
Re: 56 day v/s 28 day strength --- 7/21/2008  --- Anonymous


Click here to go to the next page of the view Click here to go to the previous page of the view Click here to collapse the view Click here to expand the view

Home  |    My Interests   |   Event Calendar  |  What's New  | Feedback |  Terms of Service  |  Related Links  |  Privacy Policy  |  Knowledge Management  |  FHWA Home  |  Bridge Technology HPC Website

HPC Definition and Research      HPC Structural Design and Specifications      HPC Mix Design and Proportioning      HPC Cast-in-Place Construction      HPC Costs      HPC Case Studies/Lessons Learned      HPC PC/PS Fabrication - Transportation - Erection      HPC Instrumentation - Monitoring - Evaluation      2003-2004 Survey Results of State DOT HPC Implementation      Self-Consolidating Concrete      Conference Proceedings      2006-2007 State DOT HPC implementation survey results      New Group      Test Group     

 Are you finding this site useful?.

Contact Site Administrators:  Lou Triandafilou

This page last updated on 11/22/2009 11:33:22 PM

United States Department of Transportation -- Federal Highway Administration


Information accessibility is important to us. If you have any problems accessing
information on this site, please contact kmadmin@fhwa.dot.gov for assistance.


To view PDF files, you need the Acrobat® Reader®

Admin Login
Administration Login
 



Click here to access the FHWA site